A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"Hashtag": "as:Hashtag"
}
],
"id": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111472838709598695",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2023-11-25T19:28:52Z",
"url": "https://hcommons.social/@ryanrandall/111472838709598695",
"attributedTo": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111472838709598695",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:hcommons.social,2023-11-25:objectId=25663866:objectType=Conversation",
"localOnly": false,
"content": "<p>Just saw a write-up at the Washington Post of very overinflated claims from an otherwise mildly interesting study. <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/edTech\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>edTech</span></a> <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/instructionalDesign\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>instructionalDesign</span></a> </p><p>My tl;dr take: watching a video of a lecture isn't meaningful videoconferencing, so the broadly-stated claims don't follow.</p><p>Failing to mention that these sessions did not include any active learning activities—and intentionally precluded all student-instructor interaction—also makes the study's claims quite overinflated.</p><p>"Groups of students accustomed to in-person learning felt fatigue when they were abruptly shifted to remote viewing" doesn't have the same pizzazz, I guess?</p><p>The WaPo article also doesn't even mention that classes can in fact be designed for asynchronous or remote participation, that students may prefer these modes for many reasons, and that the students in this study would not be representative of those groups.</p><p>Here's the OA🔓 paper: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-45374-y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">nature.com/articles/s41598-023</span><span class=\"invisible\">-45374-y</span></a><br />Here's a gift link to the WaPo story: <a href=\"https://wapo.st/3QTGLHS\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">wapo.st/3QTGLHS</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a></p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>Just saw a write-up at the Washington Post of very overinflated claims from an otherwise mildly interesting study. <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/edTech\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>edTech</span></a> <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/instructionalDesign\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>instructionalDesign</span></a> </p><p>My tl;dr take: watching a video of a lecture isn't meaningful videoconferencing, so the broadly-stated claims don't follow.</p><p>Failing to mention that these sessions did not include any active learning activities—and intentionally precluded all student-instructor interaction—also makes the study's claims quite overinflated.</p><p>"Groups of students accustomed to in-person learning felt fatigue when they were abruptly shifted to remote viewing" doesn't have the same pizzazz, I guess?</p><p>The WaPo article also doesn't even mention that classes can in fact be designed for asynchronous or remote participation, that students may prefer these modes for many reasons, and that the students in this study would not be representative of those groups.</p><p>Here's the OA🔓 paper: <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-45374-y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">nature.com/articles/s41598-023</span><span class=\"invisible\">-45374-y</span></a><br />Here's a gift link to the WaPo story: <a href=\"https://wapo.st/3QTGLHS\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">wapo.st/3QTGLHS</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a></p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://hcommons.social/tags/edtech",
"name": "#edtech"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://hcommons.social/tags/instructionaldesign",
"name": "#instructionaldesign"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111472838709598695/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111472838709598695/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111472838709598695/replies",
"items": []
}
}
}