A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"Hashtag": "as:Hashtag"
}
],
"id": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111388224522810548",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2023-11-10T20:50:22Z",
"url": "https://hcommons.social/@ryanrandall/111388224522810548",
"attributedTo": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111388224522810548",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:hcommons.social,2023-11-10:objectId=24535946:objectType=Conversation",
"localOnly": false,
"content": "<p>I've only recently become aware of the <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/OSCQR\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>OSCQR</span></a> standards, and I absolutely love that they're CC-BY openly licensed. Engaging with them was one of many great outcomes of <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/OpenEd23\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>OpenEd23</span></a>!</p><p>Can anyone more familiar with them help me better understand why Standard 4 asserts that a lack of editability is better than providing a range of document types, including .doc(x)?</p><p>The fullest explanation I can find is here: <a href=\"https://oscqr.suny.edu/standard4/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">oscqr.suny.edu/standard4/</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a></p><p>It repeatedly stresses "editable = bad," but doesn't explain precisely why, or detail what scenarios this lack of editability will solve.</p><p>From my <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/accessibility\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>accessibility</span></a>-focused perspective, allowing students ease of access in a wide variety of formats is generally best.</p><p>Is "don't edit" meant to avoid students accidentally editing and confusing themselves? Concerns about academic integrity? Fears that someone will misrepresent the syllabus outside of the institution? <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/higherEd\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>higherEd</span></a></p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>I've only recently become aware of the <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/OSCQR\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>OSCQR</span></a> standards, and I absolutely love that they're CC-BY openly licensed. Engaging with them was one of many great outcomes of <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/OpenEd23\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>OpenEd23</span></a>!</p><p>Can anyone more familiar with them help me better understand why Standard 4 asserts that a lack of editability is better than providing a range of document types, including .doc(x)?</p><p>The fullest explanation I can find is here: <a href=\"https://oscqr.suny.edu/standard4/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">oscqr.suny.edu/standard4/</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a></p><p>It repeatedly stresses "editable = bad," but doesn't explain precisely why, or detail what scenarios this lack of editability will solve.</p><p>From my <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/accessibility\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>accessibility</span></a>-focused perspective, allowing students ease of access in a wide variety of formats is generally best.</p><p>Is "don't edit" meant to avoid students accidentally editing and confusing themselves? Concerns about academic integrity? Fears that someone will misrepresent the syllabus outside of the institution? <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/higherEd\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>higherEd</span></a></p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://hcommons.social/tags/oscqr",
"name": "#oscqr"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://hcommons.social/tags/opened23",
"name": "#opened23"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://hcommons.social/tags/accessibility",
"name": "#accessibility"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://hcommons.social/tags/highered",
"name": "#highered"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111388224522810548/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111388224522810548/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://hcommons.social/users/ryanrandall/statuses/111388224522810548/replies",
"items": []
}
}
}