A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107601257357944998",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106555798217611277",
"published": "2022-01-11T01:34:48Z",
"url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/107601257357944998",
"attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107601257357944998",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106555798217611277",
"conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-01-09:objectId=4823693:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>李卓人：【官派代表支聯會】<br />支聯會已解散，政府亦取消了其公司註冊處登記，律政司卻仍堅持繼續作出控告，應該由誰去代表支聯會答辯？<br />法官羅德泉表示，其他三名被告李卓人、何俊仁及鄒幸彤「同公眾無分別」，都無權代表支聯會，只有破產管理署署長才是「合適人選」。<br />三人同聲表示反對，表明如此安排有違公平審訊！<br />李卓人於法庭上直言，破產管理署如代表支聯會，而律政司代表政府檢控支聯會，情形就如周伯通左右互搏。<br />鄒幸彤則說，如果最終由破產管理署代表支聯會，案件相當於政府「自編自導自演」，「只會變成笑話」。<br />羅官反駁，「你哋同公眾冇分別，你哋如果認為署長決定有錯，如果有申請，都係聽完之後申請」，又反問如果破產管理署署長決定代表支聯會，「我哋有冇權拒絕？」<br />何俊仁答得直接：「如果你冇權拒絕，咁無須開庭啦。」<br />法官將案件押後至2月10日繼續處理支聯會代表問題。<br />三人分別於庭上表示，要求參與2月10日聆訊，並就支聯會的法律代表問題陳詞。但申請都被羅官拒絕，羅官僅允許他們出席當日聆訊，但不得發言陳詞。</p><p><a href=\"https://www.facebook.com/leecheukyan.official/photos/a.549814965083791/4802825723116006/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">facebook.com/leecheukyan.offic</span><span class=\"invisible\">ial/photos/a.549814965083791/4802825723116006/</span></a></p>",
"contentMap": {
"zh": "<p>李卓人：【官派代表支聯會】<br />支聯會已解散，政府亦取消了其公司註冊處登記，律政司卻仍堅持繼續作出控告，應該由誰去代表支聯會答辯？<br />法官羅德泉表示，其他三名被告李卓人、何俊仁及鄒幸彤「同公眾無分別」，都無權代表支聯會，只有破產管理署署長才是「合適人選」。<br />三人同聲表示反對，表明如此安排有違公平審訊！<br />李卓人於法庭上直言，破產管理署如代表支聯會，而律政司代表政府檢控支聯會，情形就如周伯通左右互搏。<br />鄒幸彤則說，如果最終由破產管理署代表支聯會，案件相當於政府「自編自導自演」，「只會變成笑話」。<br />羅官反駁，「你哋同公眾冇分別，你哋如果認為署長決定有錯，如果有申請，都係聽完之後申請」，又反問如果破產管理署署長決定代表支聯會，「我哋有冇權拒絕？」<br />何俊仁答得直接：「如果你冇權拒絕，咁無須開庭啦。」<br />法官將案件押後至2月10日繼續處理支聯會代表問題。<br />三人分別於庭上表示，要求參與2月10日聆訊，並就支聯會的法律代表問題陳詞。但申請都被羅官拒絕，羅官僅允許他們出席當日聆訊，但不得發言陳詞。</p><p><a href=\"https://www.facebook.com/leecheukyan.official/photos/a.549814965083791/4802825723116006/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">facebook.com/leecheukyan.offic</span><span class=\"invisible\">ial/photos/a.549814965083791/4802825723116006/</span></a></p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107601257357944998/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107601257357944998/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107601257357944998/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107601257357944998/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107601257357944998/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}