A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001042449818781/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001042449818781/replies?page=true",
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001042449818781/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001042449818781/replies",
"items": [
{
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001048965751102",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001042449818781",
"published": "2021-09-27T01:33:55Z",
"url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/107001048965751102",
"attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001048965751102",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001042449818781",
"conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-04-09:objectId=5801717:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>當然，給定有類似的實證觀察，國共兩黨得出很不一樣的結論。毛主席在這基礎得出的結論，結合了自己延安經驗，提出的是生產紀律、公社生產、國營鴉片、打土分田乃至土地國有化、打算關閉國際市場。</p><p>至於國民黨，提出的則是農村金融、普設道路、管教養衛、結合美國農業科學、農業補貼、恢復對外關稅自主，而陳誠跟蕭錚他們主張土改。國共都不算的馬寅初主張節育跟一至二胎化）。而偏共黨色彩（但不是那麼共的）的梁方仲則認為國民政府的官僚機器本身就是內卷化的主因，許滌新的官僚資本論雖非談農業，但觀點類似，留學芝加哥社會系的吳景超則認為要高速發展工業來吸納農村勞力。不約而同，國共都主張要大規模機器化。</p><p>上述這樣整理下來， Chayanov這一類的「內卷化」理論是動聽的，但對於當時根據實證資料而擬定政策（無論國共），是無關痛癢的（連馬寅初談減少人口，是直接從耕地不足開始談，不是從自我剝削）。</p>",
"contentMap": {
"zh": "<p>當然，給定有類似的實證觀察，國共兩黨得出很不一樣的結論。毛主席在這基礎得出的結論，結合了自己延安經驗，提出的是生產紀律、公社生產、國營鴉片、打土分田乃至土地國有化、打算關閉國際市場。</p><p>至於國民黨，提出的則是農村金融、普設道路、管教養衛、結合美國農業科學、農業補貼、恢復對外關稅自主，而陳誠跟蕭錚他們主張土改。國共都不算的馬寅初主張節育跟一至二胎化）。而偏共黨色彩（但不是那麼共的）的梁方仲則認為國民政府的官僚機器本身就是內卷化的主因，許滌新的官僚資本論雖非談農業，但觀點類似，留學芝加哥社會系的吳景超則認為要高速發展工業來吸納農村勞力。不約而同，國共都主張要大規模機器化。</p><p>上述這樣整理下來， Chayanov這一類的「內卷化」理論是動聽的，但對於當時根據實證資料而擬定政策（無論國共），是無關痛癢的（連馬寅初談減少人口，是直接從耕地不足開始談，不是從自我剝削）。</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001048965751102/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001048965751102/replies?min_id=107001050141446222&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001048965751102/replies",
"items": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001050141446222"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001048965751102/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001048965751102/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
]
}
}