A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001039799083036/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001039799083036/replies?page=true",
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001039799083036/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001039799083036/replies",
"items": [
{
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001041211565801",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001039799083036",
"published": "2021-09-27T01:31:57Z",
"url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/107001041211565801",
"attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001041211565801",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001039799083036",
"conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-04-09:objectId=5801717:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>機器的馬克思理論裡的市場化跟商品化，便意味著資本主義化，但按照理論，資本主義化必然是僱工，而非是佃農跟自耕型式，為何會出現「市場化-商品化-但非僱工」的組合，無疑困擾了許多留洋的馬克思理論家（用毛主席的說法，這些人「機器地操作教條馬克思主義理論」）。</p><p>這乍看是個困擾，但對於當時試著搞「本土化馬克思主義」的多數人（包括毛、薛、陶希聖等人）倒不構成問題。不過，對於西方馬克思主義學者來說，這裡的矛盾必須等到1970年代的「連帶理論(articulation)才得以解決，這是後話。</p>",
"contentMap": {
"zh": "<p>機器的馬克思理論裡的市場化跟商品化，便意味著資本主義化，但按照理論，資本主義化必然是僱工，而非是佃農跟自耕型式，為何會出現「市場化-商品化-但非僱工」的組合，無疑困擾了許多留洋的馬克思理論家（用毛主席的說法，這些人「機器地操作教條馬克思主義理論」）。</p><p>這乍看是個困擾，但對於當時試著搞「本土化馬克思主義」的多數人（包括毛、薛、陶希聖等人）倒不構成問題。不過，對於西方馬克思主義學者來說，這裡的矛盾必須等到1970年代的「連帶理論(articulation)才得以解決，這是後話。</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001041211565801/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001041211565801/replies?min_id=107001042449818781&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001041211565801/replies",
"items": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001042449818781"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001041211565801/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001041211565801/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
]
}
}