A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001036442899735",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106035742582704506",
"published": "2021-09-27T01:30:44Z",
"url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/107001036442899735",
"attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001036442899735",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106035742582704506",
"conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-04-09:objectId=5801717:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.facebook.com/rainchamber123/posts/4173067792790518\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">facebook.com/rainchamber123/po</span><span class=\"invisible\">sts/4173067792790518</span></a></p><p>鄭紹鈺筆記：米穀經濟---農業「內卷」不是出於「閉關」，反而是出於小農經濟的全球市場競爭下打不贏對手（像緬甸跟美國）</p><p>這則筆記會先交待「內卷之祖」Chayanov的理論，進而談到該理論無法解釋中國跟臺灣的小農經濟，會先談1930年代中國的學術討論，並回到清代臺灣的情況。</p><p>儘管Alexander Chayanov沒有使用Geertz那潮到出水的用詞「內卷化(Involution)」，但Chayanov應該是最早提出來小農經濟會導致內卷的人。Chayanov的論證如下：小農是非資本主義的，因為小農沒有涉入僱傭勞動，通常是自己一塊田，或幫地主耕田，耕田是出於自給自足，生產是為了餵飽家中丁口，如果家中小孩數量少，小農就會多出休閒時間，Chayanov又預設農民不懂避孕，家中會不斷有小孩子出生，農民為了生產足夠的糧食，便會開始增加勞動，進而達到「自我剝削」的狀態。這樣的小農經濟是不效率的，也是小農社會在全球化時代普遍破產的原因。</p>",
"contentMap": {
"zh": "<p><a href=\"https://www.facebook.com/rainchamber123/posts/4173067792790518\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">facebook.com/rainchamber123/po</span><span class=\"invisible\">sts/4173067792790518</span></a></p><p>鄭紹鈺筆記：米穀經濟---農業「內卷」不是出於「閉關」，反而是出於小農經濟的全球市場競爭下打不贏對手（像緬甸跟美國）</p><p>這則筆記會先交待「內卷之祖」Chayanov的理論，進而談到該理論無法解釋中國跟臺灣的小農經濟，會先談1930年代中國的學術討論，並回到清代臺灣的情況。</p><p>儘管Alexander Chayanov沒有使用Geertz那潮到出水的用詞「內卷化(Involution)」，但Chayanov應該是最早提出來小農經濟會導致內卷的人。Chayanov的論證如下：小農是非資本主義的，因為小農沒有涉入僱傭勞動，通常是自己一塊田，或幫地主耕田，耕田是出於自給自足，生產是為了餵飽家中丁口，如果家中小孩數量少，小農就會多出休閒時間，Chayanov又預設農民不懂避孕，家中會不斷有小孩子出生，農民為了生產足夠的糧食，便會開始增加勞動，進而達到「自我剝削」的狀態。這樣的小農經濟是不效率的，也是小農社會在全球化時代普遍破產的原因。</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001036442899735/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001036442899735/replies?min_id=107001038211964981&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001036442899735/replies",
"items": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001038211964981"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001036442899735/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/107001036442899735/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}