A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935867216740890/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935867216740890/replies?page=true",
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935867216740890/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935867216740890/replies",
"items": [
{
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935869650032952",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935867216740890",
"published": "2021-09-15T13:17:58Z",
"url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/106935869650032952",
"attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935869650032952",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935867216740890",
"conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-04-09:objectId=5801717:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>不無巧合的是，這三個自吹自擂的角度，恰好與目前三種國家建構理論相對應。這三種理論——<br />1. 意識形態論（建國主要與民族意識、文化共同體形成及現代化有關）；<br />2. 制度承諾論（建國主要與重整國內利益及權力分配有關）；<br />3. 國家鬥爭論（主權國家是面對戰爭威脅必須有效集合資本和武力的結果）<br />——主要從國內因素解釋主權國家的形成。</p><p>然而世界任何一地都無法自外於國際政治。外來干預怎樣影響主權國家的形成？怎樣將外來干預納入國家建構理論？這就是《建國與國際政治：近代中印泰主權國家建國比較史（1893-1952）》（External Intervention and the Politics of State Foundation: China, Indonesia, and Thailand, 1893-1952）[3] 要探討的課題。</p><p>作為非專業讀者，這書的論證過程對我來說相當複雜，因此以下我會花多些篇幅說明全書的論證策略。</p>",
"contentMap": {
"zh": "<p>不無巧合的是，這三個自吹自擂的角度，恰好與目前三種國家建構理論相對應。這三種理論——<br />1. 意識形態論（建國主要與民族意識、文化共同體形成及現代化有關）；<br />2. 制度承諾論（建國主要與重整國內利益及權力分配有關）；<br />3. 國家鬥爭論（主權國家是面對戰爭威脅必須有效集合資本和武力的結果）<br />——主要從國內因素解釋主權國家的形成。</p><p>然而世界任何一地都無法自外於國際政治。外來干預怎樣影響主權國家的形成？怎樣將外來干預納入國家建構理論？這就是《建國與國際政治：近代中印泰主權國家建國比較史（1893-1952）》（External Intervention and the Politics of State Foundation: China, Indonesia, and Thailand, 1893-1952）[3] 要探討的課題。</p><p>作為非專業讀者，這書的論證過程對我來說相當複雜，因此以下我會花多些篇幅說明全書的論證策略。</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935869650032952/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935869650032952/replies?min_id=106935872127143522&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935869650032952/replies",
"items": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935872127143522"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935869650032952/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106935869650032952/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
]
}
}