A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908027922699290/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908027922699290/replies?page=true",
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908027922699290/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908027922699290/replies",
"items": [
{
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908069932708900",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908027922699290",
"published": "2021-09-10T15:28:08Z",
"url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/106908069932708900",
"attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908069932708900",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908027922699290",
"conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-04-09:objectId=5801717:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>正如我在其他地方提到，這種取向可謂嬰兒潮世代學者理論影響力拖得太長的表表者。嬰兒潮一代壟斷了左派的想像力——留下強大的解構和批判權威的能力，但建構和創作能力則很孱弱。也許 「68世代」對那些繼承他們爛攤子的人的最後報復，就是那條知識分子的教條——結構本身總是比其拆除更惹人懷疑、建立比抵抗更有問題。這不僅僅是政治策略，而是形而上學準則。他們的願景不論過去還是現在，都是通過對公共理性、決策以及結構的想像性拆解，將條件性的觀點作為手段和目的本身 橫向增殖。這就是他們如何在拒絕 「管治性」的同時迷戀 「政治」。</p><p>我就是在這種傳統中長大的，但世界的運作方式，與68世代和他們秘書們所想像的非常不同。我希望哲學不會繼續令那些需要創造、構成和結構化另類願景的人失望。//</p>",
"contentMap": {
"zh": "<p>正如我在其他地方提到，這種取向可謂嬰兒潮世代學者理論影響力拖得太長的表表者。嬰兒潮一代壟斷了左派的想像力——留下強大的解構和批判權威的能力，但建構和創作能力則很孱弱。也許 「68世代」對那些繼承他們爛攤子的人的最後報復，就是那條知識分子的教條——結構本身總是比其拆除更惹人懷疑、建立比抵抗更有問題。這不僅僅是政治策略，而是形而上學準則。他們的願景不論過去還是現在，都是通過對公共理性、決策以及結構的想像性拆解，將條件性的觀點作為手段和目的本身 橫向增殖。這就是他們如何在拒絕 「管治性」的同時迷戀 「政治」。</p><p>我就是在這種傳統中長大的，但世界的運作方式，與68世代和他們秘書們所想像的非常不同。我希望哲學不會繼續令那些需要創造、構成和結構化另類願景的人失望。//</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908069932708900/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908069932708900/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908069932708900/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908069932708900/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 2
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106908069932708900/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 3
}
}
]
}
}