ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount" } ], "id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106590822360163963", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106035742582704506", "published": "2021-07-16T14:47:54Z", "url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/106590822360163963", "attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106590822360163963", "inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106035742582704506", "conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-04-09:objectId=5801717:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p>// 王: 我的批評不是「地圖炮」,而是特別針對儒家的。你說得對,反省的種種限制是心理事實,無論是甚麼人的自我反省,甚麼哲學或宗教框架裏所做的反省,都難以擺脫這些限制,以致反省的結果往往不可靠。然而,儒家的問題不在於儒者也受有關的心理機制所限,而在於對人的反省力有過份強大的信心,因而過份信賴反省的作用。</p><p>你提到的佛教、基督教和蘇格拉底式哲學確實皆重視反省,但和儒家對反省的看法終究有別。佛教與基督教說的反省都需要宗教的輔助。佛教對人的反省力也相當有信心,但卻意識到反省力的作用會受到複雜的心理機制所障礙,因而有不同層次的禪修,以達致一種心靈境界,用來對治這些障礙。基督教則強調神在人的反省中的重要角色,例如加爾文 (John Calvin) 不但認為人要認識自己才能夠認識神,也認為人要認識神才能夠認識自己;雖然他沒有講清楚這兩者孰先孰後還是相輔相成,但至少反映出他意識到反省的限制。</p><p>《【對談】儒家思想(上)》<a href=\"https://thestandnews.page.link/3zFhHB8ivo7qTDCt5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">thestandnews.page.link/3zFhHB8</span><span class=\"invisible\">ivo7qTDCt5</span></a> - 立場新聞</p>", "contentMap": { "zh": "<p>// 王: 我的批評不是「地圖炮」,而是特別針對儒家的。你說得對,反省的種種限制是心理事實,無論是甚麼人的自我反省,甚麼哲學或宗教框架裏所做的反省,都難以擺脫這些限制,以致反省的結果往往不可靠。然而,儒家的問題不在於儒者也受有關的心理機制所限,而在於對人的反省力有過份強大的信心,因而過份信賴反省的作用。</p><p>你提到的佛教、基督教和蘇格拉底式哲學確實皆重視反省,但和儒家對反省的看法終究有別。佛教與基督教說的反省都需要宗教的輔助。佛教對人的反省力也相當有信心,但卻意識到反省力的作用會受到複雜的心理機制所障礙,因而有不同層次的禪修,以達致一種心靈境界,用來對治這些障礙。基督教則強調神在人的反省中的重要角色,例如加爾文 (John Calvin) 不但認為人要認識自己才能夠認識神,也認為人要認識神才能夠認識自己;雖然他沒有講清楚這兩者孰先孰後還是相輔相成,但至少反映出他意識到反省的限制。</p><p>《【對談】儒家思想(上)》<a href=\"https://thestandnews.page.link/3zFhHB8ivo7qTDCt5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">thestandnews.page.link/3zFhHB8</span><span class=\"invisible\">ivo7qTDCt5</span></a> - 立場新聞</p>" }, "attachment": [], "tag": [], "replies": { "id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106590822360163963/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106590822360163963/replies?min_id=106590823639077855&page=true", "partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106590822360163963/replies", "items": [ "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106590823639077855" ] } }, "likes": { "id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106590822360163963/likes", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 2 }, "shares": { "id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106590822360163963/shares", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 0 } }