A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475",
"published": "2021-07-03T10:51:27Z",
"url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/106516282554780085",
"attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475",
"conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-01-09:objectId=4823693:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>他繼而點出法律有兩大功能，一是「約束人的行為」；二是「保障人的權利」，但現時的趨勢卻墜於一偏，只向前者靠攏。</p><p>白髮蒼蒼的張耀良強調此案無關國安法，應該回到疑罪從無的香港法治傳統。最後他更憶述終審法院前首席法官李國能退休時寄語同仁，毋忘「恆久警惕乃自由的代價」（eternal vigilance is the price of freedom），希望香淑嫻能夠繼志承道。</p><p>香淑嫻花了數分鐘閱讀兩文，全盤接納控方論點，謂控罪嚴重，被告重犯，不得保釋，延至 7.30 再訊，鄒幸彤保留七日後（7.09）再出庭覆核保釋的權利。</p><p>香淑嫻的人還未離開法庭，旁聽者已當她不存在，群起向鄒幸彤打氣。鄒盡力舉手揮舞，在獄卒的拖拉下消失於犯人欄。</p><p>公眾對判決的不滿遠超以往，群情激憤，不斷大喊「文字獄」。筆者詢問其中一名老人家，他說自己只是「蟻民」不諳法律，但他聽不到香淑嫻有回應過張耀良的論証，無法令他心服口服，「我地認認真真用時間用精力嚟聽審，我地係希望仲殘存一啲法治。但有咩？」</p><p>「依幢大樓（西九龍法院）拎去做酒店咪好囉，點解要做法庭呀？」//</p>",
"contentMap": {
"zh": "<p>他繼而點出法律有兩大功能，一是「約束人的行為」；二是「保障人的權利」，但現時的趨勢卻墜於一偏，只向前者靠攏。</p><p>白髮蒼蒼的張耀良強調此案無關國安法，應該回到疑罪從無的香港法治傳統。最後他更憶述終審法院前首席法官李國能退休時寄語同仁，毋忘「恆久警惕乃自由的代價」（eternal vigilance is the price of freedom），希望香淑嫻能夠繼志承道。</p><p>香淑嫻花了數分鐘閱讀兩文，全盤接納控方論點，謂控罪嚴重，被告重犯，不得保釋，延至 7.30 再訊，鄒幸彤保留七日後（7.09）再出庭覆核保釋的權利。</p><p>香淑嫻的人還未離開法庭，旁聽者已當她不存在，群起向鄒幸彤打氣。鄒盡力舉手揮舞，在獄卒的拖拉下消失於犯人欄。</p><p>公眾對判決的不滿遠超以往，群情激憤，不斷大喊「文字獄」。筆者詢問其中一名老人家，他說自己只是「蟻民」不諳法律，但他聽不到香淑嫻有回應過張耀良的論証，無法令他心服口服，「我地認認真真用時間用精力嚟聽審，我地係希望仲殘存一啲法治。但有咩？」</p><p>「依幢大樓（西九龍法院）拎去做酒店咪好囉，點解要做法庭呀？」//</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 2
}
}