ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount" } ], "id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516276530128611", "published": "2021-07-03T10:50:58Z", "url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/106516280642764475", "attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475", "inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516276530128611", "conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-01-09:objectId=4823693:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p>儘管犯人欄內只有鄒幸彤一人,卻有足足九名警員環伺她。當法庭職員讀出控罪,鄒幸彤先答「悼念六四無罪!」才說「聽得明。」</p><p>控方交代兩大罪證,來自鄒於 FB 的帖文;和她在《明報》的評論。由於去年六四她已被控未經批准集結,如今又再干犯煽惑集結,控方以此為由要求羈押。</p><p>輪到辯方發言,代表鄒幸彤的正是她在律師行的「師父」張耀良。他首先澄清去年六四案鄒幸彤乃遭傳票檢控,一直毋須保釋,因此不屬「保釋期間再犯」。</p><p>他舉凡過去審訊一旦牽涉文獻,法官都重申要從整體著眼,不能斷章取義。他說通觀兩文主旨,都是表達對六四的悲痛,呼籲民眾堅持悼念,而非呼籲去哪兒悼念,「佢幾時寫過去邊度悼念?喺屋企,去西貢悼念都得。」可是控方抽離脈絡(out of context)的舉證,乃基於比喻和猜度,倘若這樣深文周納依然可以羅織,很容易淪為「文字獄」以言入罪。</p>", "contentMap": { "zh": "<p>儘管犯人欄內只有鄒幸彤一人,卻有足足九名警員環伺她。當法庭職員讀出控罪,鄒幸彤先答「悼念六四無罪!」才說「聽得明。」</p><p>控方交代兩大罪證,來自鄒於 FB 的帖文;和她在《明報》的評論。由於去年六四她已被控未經批准集結,如今又再干犯煽惑集結,控方以此為由要求羈押。</p><p>輪到辯方發言,代表鄒幸彤的正是她在律師行的「師父」張耀良。他首先澄清去年六四案鄒幸彤乃遭傳票檢控,一直毋須保釋,因此不屬「保釋期間再犯」。</p><p>他舉凡過去審訊一旦牽涉文獻,法官都重申要從整體著眼,不能斷章取義。他說通觀兩文主旨,都是表達對六四的悲痛,呼籲民眾堅持悼念,而非呼籲去哪兒悼念,「佢幾時寫過去邊度悼念?喺屋企,去西貢悼念都得。」可是控方抽離脈絡(out of context)的舉證,乃基於比喻和猜度,倘若這樣深文周納依然可以羅織,很容易淪為「文字獄」以言入罪。</p>" }, "attachment": [], "tag": [], "replies": { "id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/replies?min_id=106516282554780085&page=true", "partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/replies", "items": [ "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085" ] } }, "likes": { "id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/likes", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 0 }, "shares": { "id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/shares", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 0 } }