A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount"
}
],
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516276530128611/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516276530128611/replies?page=true",
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516276530128611/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516276530128611/replies",
"items": [
{
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516276530128611",
"published": "2021-07-03T10:50:58Z",
"url": "https://g0v.social/@amokhuxley/106516280642764475",
"attributedTo": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516276530128611",
"conversation": "tag:g0v.social,2021-01-09:objectId=4823693:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>儘管犯人欄內只有鄒幸彤一人，卻有足足九名警員環伺她。當法庭職員讀出控罪，鄒幸彤先答「悼念六四無罪！」才說「聽得明。」</p><p>控方交代兩大罪證，來自鄒於 FB 的帖文；和她在《明報》的評論。由於去年六四她已被控未經批准集結，如今又再干犯煽惑集結，控方以此為由要求羈押。</p><p>輪到辯方發言，代表鄒幸彤的正是她在律師行的「師父」張耀良。他首先澄清去年六四案鄒幸彤乃遭傳票檢控，一直毋須保釋，因此不屬「保釋期間再犯」。</p><p>他舉凡過去審訊一旦牽涉文獻，法官都重申要從整體著眼，不能斷章取義。他說通觀兩文主旨，都是表達對六四的悲痛，呼籲民眾堅持悼念，而非呼籲去哪兒悼念，「佢幾時寫過去邊度悼念？喺屋企，去西貢悼念都得。」可是控方抽離脈絡（out of context）的舉證，乃基於比喻和猜度，倘若這樣深文周納依然可以羅織，很容易淪為「文字獄」以言入罪。</p>",
"contentMap": {
"zh": "<p>儘管犯人欄內只有鄒幸彤一人，卻有足足九名警員環伺她。當法庭職員讀出控罪，鄒幸彤先答「悼念六四無罪！」才說「聽得明。」</p><p>控方交代兩大罪證，來自鄒於 FB 的帖文；和她在《明報》的評論。由於去年六四她已被控未經批准集結，如今又再干犯煽惑集結，控方以此為由要求羈押。</p><p>輪到辯方發言，代表鄒幸彤的正是她在律師行的「師父」張耀良。他首先澄清去年六四案鄒幸彤乃遭傳票檢控，一直毋須保釋，因此不屬「保釋期間再犯」。</p><p>他舉凡過去審訊一旦牽涉文獻，法官都重申要從整體著眼，不能斷章取義。他說通觀兩文主旨，都是表達對六四的悲痛，呼籲民眾堅持悼念，而非呼籲去哪兒悼念，「佢幾時寫過去邊度悼念？喺屋企，去西貢悼念都得。」可是控方抽離脈絡（out of context）的舉證，乃基於比喻和猜度，倘若這樣深文周納依然可以羅織，很容易淪為「文字獄」以言入罪。</p>"
},
"attachment": [],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/replies?min_id=106516282554780085&page=true",
"partOf": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/replies",
"items": [
"https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516282554780085"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://g0v.social/users/amokhuxley/statuses/106516280642764475/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
]
}
}