A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"blurhash": "toot:blurhash",
"focalPoint": {
"@container": "@list",
"@id": "toot:focalPoint"
}
}
],
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507302478150034/activity",
"type": "Create",
"actor": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim",
"published": "2022-12-13T16:27:09Z",
"to": [
"https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/followers"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"object": {
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507302478150034",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507298935741938",
"published": "2022-12-13T16:27:09Z",
"url": "https://econtwitter.net/@brhkim/109507302478150034",
"attributedTo": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim",
"to": [
"https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/followers"
],
"cc": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507302478150034",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507298935741938",
"conversation": "tag:econtwitter.net,2022-12-13:objectId=2804468:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>(And while this slice isn't perfect -- much more investigation to do -- no evidence of algorithmic bias! If anything, alignment with human coders is *stronger* when examining data from underserved groups. Could reflect that it just aligns with existing human biases, though this human coder group seems unlikely to exhibit this issue)</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>(And while this slice isn't perfect -- much more investigation to do -- no evidence of algorithmic bias! If anything, alignment with human coders is *stronger* when examining data from underserved groups. Could reflect that it just aligns with existing human biases, though this human coder group seems unlikely to exhibit this issue)</p>"
},
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"mediaType": "image/png",
"url": "https://econtwitter-media.mwt.me/media_attachments/files/109/507/300/293/502/418/original/b4daf0071eb7e843.png",
"name": null,
"blurhash": "U3S$ovWBxuM{D%WBWBof00xu-;t7RjWBWBof",
"width": 1663,
"height": 1247
}
],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507302478150034/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507302478150034/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507302478150034/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507302478150034/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109507302478150034/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
}