A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"blurhash": "toot:blurhash",
"focalPoint": {
"@container": "@list",
"@id": "toot:focalPoint"
}
}
],
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119730015375249/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119730015375249/replies?page=true",
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119730015375249/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119730015375249/replies",
"items": [
{
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119840336037389",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119730015375249",
"published": "2023-03-31T20:43:35Z",
"url": "https://econtwitter.net/@asjadnaqvi/110119840336037389",
"attributedTo": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119840336037389",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119730015375249",
"conversation": "tag:econtwitter.net,2023-03-31:objectId=9691099:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>Here is a income distribution analysis from 1929 for the US. Top 1% had an of >=15k. Bottom 40% <=1k. This alluvial graph is not that easy to read.</p><p>Also would be interesting to compare it to the distribution today.</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>Here is a income distribution analysis from 1929 for the US. Top 1% had an of >=15k. Bottom 40% <=1k. This alluvial graph is not that easy to read.</p><p>Also would be interesting to compare it to the distribution today.</p>"
},
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"mediaType": "image/png",
"url": "https://econtwitter-media.mwt.me/media_attachments/files/110/119/840/245/645/075/original/ddf1f22a5852c041.png",
"name": null,
"blurhash": "U2J*bN~q~T^*=}s:t7M{MexuWCM|-:Rjt6xt",
"width": 518,
"height": 753
}
],
"tag": [],
"replies": {
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119840336037389/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119840336037389/replies?min_id=110119855983830284&page=true",
"partOf": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119840336037389/replies",
"items": [
"https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119855983830284"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119840336037389/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/asjadnaqvi/statuses/110119840336037389/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
]
}
}