ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount", "Hashtag": "as:Hashtag" } ], "id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109593380270863487", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": null, "published": "2022-12-28T21:17:52Z", "url": "https://econtwitter.net/@brhkim/109593380270863487", "attributedTo": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/followers" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109593380270863487", "inReplyToAtomUri": null, "conversation": "tag:econtwitter.net,2022-12-28:objectId=4166369:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p>Is there a formal name for the phenomenon where people seem to apply greater levels of scrutiny or criticism to stats/reports/research they disagree with than those they agree with?</p><p>I&#39;ve been calling this &quot;differential scrutiny&quot; but I feel like there has to be a more common name</p><p><a href=\"https://econtwitter.net/tags/science\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>science</span></a> <a href=\"https://econtwitter.net/tags/scicomm\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>scicomm</span></a> <a href=\"https://econtwitter.net/tags/econtwitter\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>econtwitter</span></a></p>", "contentMap": { "en": "<p>Is there a formal name for the phenomenon where people seem to apply greater levels of scrutiny or criticism to stats/reports/research they disagree with than those they agree with?</p><p>I&#39;ve been calling this &quot;differential scrutiny&quot; but I feel like there has to be a more common name</p><p><a href=\"https://econtwitter.net/tags/science\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>science</span></a> <a href=\"https://econtwitter.net/tags/scicomm\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>scicomm</span></a> <a href=\"https://econtwitter.net/tags/econtwitter\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>econtwitter</span></a></p>" }, "attachment": [], "tag": [ { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://econtwitter.net/tags/science", "name": "#science" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://econtwitter.net/tags/scicomm", "name": "#scicomm" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://econtwitter.net/tags/econtwitter", "name": "#econtwitter" } ], "replies": { "id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109593380270863487/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109593380270863487/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true", "partOf": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109593380270863487/replies", "items": [] } }, "likes": { "id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109593380270863487/likes", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 9 }, "shares": { "id": "https://econtwitter.net/users/brhkim/statuses/109593380270863487/shares", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 5 } }