A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"id": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/object/ad23d420e339c8606b94cac8e1ed510c",
"type": "Note",
"audience": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/d69861bff1600151b3cf3170936fcbb0",
"to": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/d69861bff1600151b3cf3170936fcbb0",
"cc": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"published": "2024-05-31T23:07:49Z",
"updated": "2024-05-31T23:07:49Z",
"url": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/t/how-would-you-like-to-add-new-categories-for-projects-or-committees/28330/4",
"attributedTo": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/1a582431e76511ca6b0ff2268e580e5f",
"context": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/collection/de78a095358a308a916b5f5448d6dd9d",
"content": "pgrouting-users and pgrouting-dev are separate lists.\nJust as postgis has a postgis-users, postgis-develop\nOne is for users using the system and another is for those trying to add new functionality or questions about how to add functionality. I think that is a common structure for many projects.\nQGIS is a much more complicated beast and has way more sub categorizations.\nI'm leaning toward projects should be at the root and then can subcategorize their category however they want.\nRegarding SAC, …<br><br><a href=\"https://discourse.osgeo.org/t/how-would-you-like-to-add-new-categories-for-projects-or-committees/28330/4\">Discuss this on our forum.</a>",
"inReplyTo": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/object/2919f4415b1530f1c2828994f37b0112",
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"
}