A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"id": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/object/2919f4415b1530f1c2828994f37b0112",
"type": "Note",
"audience": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/d69861bff1600151b3cf3170936fcbb0",
"to": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/d69861bff1600151b3cf3170936fcbb0",
"cc": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"published": "2024-05-31T22:52:07Z",
"updated": "2024-05-31T22:52:07Z",
"url": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/t/how-would-you-like-to-add-new-categories-for-projects-or-committees/28330/3",
"attributedTo": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/99e6b82662d318eda33778c500f40c9b",
"context": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/collection/de78a095358a308a916b5f5448d6dd9d",
"content": "Could I recommend that a structure be established before inviting more groups here!\nMy own take that these tradeoffs are the usual public / private\n\nIf it is public facing content \"QGIS\", \"GeoServer\" and \"GeoNetwork\" make sense top-level\nIf it is for \"internal\" list-serve style content then \"committee/system admin\" and \"committee/marketing\" makes sense.\nTop-level \"SAC\" does not make sense (is not friendly) for anyone \nI do not think we need duplication (pgrouting/pgrouting-users, pgrouting/pgrou…<br><br><a href=\"https://discourse.osgeo.org/t/how-would-you-like-to-add-new-categories-for-projects-or-committees/28330/3\">Discuss this on our forum.</a>",
"inReplyTo": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/object/eebef734e39915274f72ea3962c894af",
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"
}