A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"id": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/object/10827e725b24684826d0ddfa1a0e05a9",
"type": "Note",
"audience": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/d69861bff1600151b3cf3170936fcbb0",
"to": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/d69861bff1600151b3cf3170936fcbb0",
"cc": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"published": "2024-06-05T08:07:31Z",
"updated": "2024-06-05T08:07:31Z",
"url": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/t/how-would-you-like-to-add-new-categories-for-projects-or-committees/28330/5",
"attributedTo": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/actor/5cec1004c8c4f35f2f0230cb92e918fd",
"context": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/collection/de78a095358a308a916b5f5448d6dd9d",
"content": "Hi there, thanks for raising up the topic.\nIn my humble opinion, it would indeed be better to organize the categories at the top level. We will get quickly lost (if it's not already the case) when the amount of root categories will increase.\nIt's confusing to find\n\nprojects\ngeneral\nlocal chapter\nGFOSS.it (which is a local chapter isn't it ?)\ninitiatives\nand so on at the same level.\n\nI would go for a cleaner root overview like\n\nprojects\nlocal chapters\nand other root categories to handle admin stu…<br><br><a href=\"https://discourse.osgeo.org/t/how-would-you-like-to-add-new-categories-for-projects-or-committees/28330/5\">Discuss this on our forum.</a>",
"inReplyTo": "https://discourse.osgeo.org/ap/object/ad23d420e339c8606b94cac8e1ed510c",
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"
}