ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount" } ], "id": "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs/statuses/101706517946041465", "type": "Note", "summary": "BIBFRAME linked data - argh", "inReplyTo": null, "published": "2019-03-07T00:25:03Z", "url": "https://code4lib.social/@dbs/101706517946041465", "attributedTo": "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs/followers" ], "sensitive": true, "atomUri": "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs/statuses/101706517946041465", "inReplyToAtomUri": null, "conversation": "tag:code4lib.social,2019-03-07:objectId=168392:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p>A few weeks ago I asked why identifiers in BIBFRAME must be literal values, instead of URIs.</p><p>44 messages later, after being asked what I would expect from dereferencing a URI, I find myself quoting Tim Berners-Lee&#39;s original linked data principles.</p><p>And responding to an assertion that &quot;We have established X&quot; when X, AFAICT, was never established.</p><p>Clearly I&#39;m missing something. Like, the design rationale for BIBFRAME.</p>", "contentMap": { "en": "<p>A few weeks ago I asked why identifiers in BIBFRAME must be literal values, instead of URIs.</p><p>44 messages later, after being asked what I would expect from dereferencing a URI, I find myself quoting Tim Berners-Lee&#39;s original linked data principles.</p><p>And responding to an assertion that &quot;We have established X&quot; when X, AFAICT, was never established.</p><p>Clearly I&#39;m missing something. Like, the design rationale for BIBFRAME.</p>" }, "attachment": [], "tag": [], "replies": { "id": "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs/statuses/101706517946041465/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs/statuses/101706517946041465/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true", "partOf": "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs/statuses/101706517946041465/replies", "items": [] } }, "likes": { "id": "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs/statuses/101706517946041465/likes", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 3 }, "shares": { "id": "https://code4lib.social/users/dbs/statuses/101706517946041465/shares", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 0 } }