A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://clubcyberia.co/schemas/litepub-0.1.jsonld",
{
"@language": "und"
}
],
"actor": "https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla",
"attachment": [
{
"mediaType": "video/mp4",
"name": "",
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://s3.clubcyberia.co/pleroma/d784ed59eb52da37b6aeadaad531e4661e716cfc45ca2359a32468c17c48479a.mp4"
}
],
"attributedTo": "https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla",
"cc": [
"https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla/followers"
],
"content": "I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.<br><br>For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.<br><br>The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.<br><br>There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.<br><br>The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. <br><br>In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within that category)<br><br>For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.<br><br>The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. <br><br>All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.<br><br><a href=\"http://x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19\" rel=\"ugc\">x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19</a>",
"context": "https://clubcyberia.co/contexts/35e5361a-f4fb-4c48-92eb-64414844552c",
"conversation": "https://clubcyberia.co/contexts/35e5361a-f4fb-4c48-92eb-64414844552c",
"formerRepresentations": {
"orderedItems": [
{
"actor": "https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla",
"attachment": [
{
"mediaType": "video/mp4",
"name": "",
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://s3.clubcyberia.co/pleroma/d784ed59eb52da37b6aeadaad531e4661e716cfc45ca2359a32468c17c48479a.mp4"
}
],
"attributedTo": "https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla",
"cc": [
"https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla/followers"
],
"content": "I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.<br><br>For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.<br><br>The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.<br><br>There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.<br><br>The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. <br><br>In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within it that category)<br><br>For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.<br><br>The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. <br><br>All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.<br><br><a href=\"http://x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19\" rel=\"ugc\">x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19</a>",
"context": "https://clubcyberia.co/contexts/35e5361a-f4fb-4c48-92eb-64414844552c",
"conversation": "https://clubcyberia.co/contexts/35e5361a-f4fb-4c48-92eb-64414844552c",
"published": "2025-01-31T11:11:06.604851Z",
"source": {
"content": "I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.\r\n\r\nFor starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.\r\n\r\nThe discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.\r\n\r\nThere was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.\r\n\r\nThe whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made \"the relevant facts\" apparent to both interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. \r\n\r\nIn many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the \"tech-right\" and \"the cultural right\", where the \"tech-right\" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the \"cultural right\" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within it that category)\r\n\r\nFor me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.\r\n\r\nThe answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. \r\n\r\nAll this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.\r\n\r\nx.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
},
"summary": "Fuentes v Fang Twitter Spaces Debate",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note",
"updated": "2025-01-31T11:12:59.177568Z"
},
{
"actor": "https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla",
"attachment": [
{
"mediaType": "video/mp4",
"name": "",
"type": "Document",
"url": "https://s3.clubcyberia.co/pleroma/d784ed59eb52da37b6aeadaad531e4661e716cfc45ca2359a32468c17c48479a.mp4"
}
],
"attributedTo": "https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla",
"cc": [
"https://clubcyberia.co/users/Dulla/followers"
],
"content": "I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.<br><br>For starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.<br><br>The discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.<br><br>There was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.<br><br>The whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made "the relevant facts" apparent to both Interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. <br><br>In many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the "tech-right" and "the cultural right", where the "tech-right" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the "cultural right" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within it that category)<br><br>For me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.<br><br>The answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. <br><br>All this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.<br><br><a href=\"http://x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19\" rel=\"ugc\">x.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19</a>",
"context": "https://clubcyberia.co/contexts/35e5361a-f4fb-4c48-92eb-64414844552c",
"conversation": "https://clubcyberia.co/contexts/35e5361a-f4fb-4c48-92eb-64414844552c",
"published": "2025-01-31T11:11:06.604851Z",
"source": {
"content": "I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.\r\n\r\nFor starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.\r\n\r\nThe discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.\r\n\r\nThere was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.\r\n\r\nThe whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made \"the relevant facts\" apparent to both Interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. \r\n\r\nIn many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the \"tech-right\" and \"the cultural right\", where the \"tech-right\" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the \"cultural right\" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within it that category)\r\n\r\nFor me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.\r\n\r\nThe answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. \r\n\r\nAll this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.\r\n\r\nx.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
},
"summary": "Fuentes v Fang Twitter Spaces Debate",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note"
}
],
"totalItems": 2,
"type": "OrderedCollection"
},
"id": "https://clubcyberia.co/objects/9f1a9506-a348-48e9-a2ac-aa4171567610",
"published": "2025-01-31T11:11:06.604851Z",
"repliesCount": 1,
"source": {
"content": "I just finished the Fuentes v Fang discussion and I think it was actually a critical piece of discourse to assessing the political trajectory of the US in the next 20-50 years.\r\n\r\nFor starters, Fuentes got into it with deconstructing a portion of the Thiel network of influencers online, and how Thiel acts as the hidden hand in which Thiel himself is able to spread influence of his views and financial interests through the spokesmen of the effectively mercenary political groups of which he is covertly funding.\r\n\r\nThe discussion then moves into discussing various subjects within the public political discourse including the roles of influencer networks, doxxing, media, race, values, women, immigration, free speech, advertiser networks, innovation, and technology implementation within society.\r\n\r\nThere was a lot of good ground covered, and frankly, I agree with the position of Fuentes--that some have even gotten to before he had--regarding Thiel's influence network basically taking over America through secret smoky room, high society networking back channels that bleed onto social media. The Thielbux meme is probably real to a certain extent. For all we know, Fuentes may be getting Thielbux himself, in sort of a limited hangout type way.\r\n\r\nThe whole debate in general was reminiscent of the couple of immigration debates Fuentes held with Destiny a couple years ago (you can find them on Destiny's channel if you haven't seen them-- they're quite good). This feels like the next iteration of that where memesis has made \"the relevant facts\" apparent to both interlocutors, and so both Fuentes and Fang have a distinct conceptual understanding of where things stand amongst their individual and collective audiences. \r\n\r\nIn many ways, this felt like the culmination of sentiments that have built up between the \"tech-right\" and \"the cultural right\", where the \"tech-right\" believes a breakaway tech syndicates are the only way to get ahead, whereas the \"cultural right\" would have a greater interest in slowing, limiting, or sequester-subjugating technological innovation growth in order to not risk breaking the fabric of US society in general-- basically an accelerationism vs decelerationism difference of opinion. **(I know Fuentes isn't a representative of the complete concept of 'cultural right' as there's alot of different shades of it, but he does have a brand within that category)\r\n\r\nFor me, as much as I was pro-tech a number of years ago, at this point in time, I can see how tech oligarchy--if given full impunity--has the capability to basically take all of the money and force the government to strip every single right of US citizens.\r\n\r\nThe answer, therefore, for any given US citizen as far as I'm concerned is that perhaps this track may be probable, but whilst the US dollar still means something, you should acquire as much of it as you can so that you can defend yourself using the same tactics that the technocracy use so that you can stake your lot somewhere even if they use all kinds of money and corrupt politicians to break laws to try to take it from you. In this vein, I'm not against people developing local artistic movements or whatever to prevent soulless app tyranny enforced by law to only allot you 5 grains of rice and a smiley face. \r\n\r\nAll this to say, one should use the base resources they have to improve their financial position. Often times, there's alot of free, accessible resources that one can use to make quantum leaps. This is one of them. Social media in general can be a tool. Base technology like this can be used to carve away marketshare from even those with billions. Media is a powerful resource-- use it.\r\n\r\nx.com/blyzedog/status/1885230853837500741?t=A152rEUMgm81bSk-9FTvdA&s=19",
"mediaType": "text/plain"
},
"summary": "Fuentes v Fang Twitter Spaces Debate",
"tag": [],
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"type": "Note",
"updated": "2025-01-31T11:13:25.710842Z"
}