ActivityPub Viewer

A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a request with the right Accept header to the server to view the underlying object.

Open in browser →
{ "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", { "ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#", "atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri", "inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri", "conversation": "ostatus:conversation", "sensitive": "as:sensitive", "toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#", "votersCount": "toot:votersCount", "Hashtag": "as:Hashtag" } ], "id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112981809088195371", "type": "Note", "summary": null, "inReplyTo": null, "published": "2024-08-18T07:19:52Z", "url": "https://c.im/@sbb/112981809088195371", "attributedTo": "https://c.im/users/sbb", "to": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" ], "cc": [ "https://c.im/users/sbb/followers" ], "sensitive": false, "atomUri": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112981809088195371", "inReplyToAtomUri": null, "conversation": "tag:c.im,2024-08-18:objectId=198857932:objectType=Conversation", "content": "<p>In <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Buddhism\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Buddhism</span></a>, there are thankfully no &quot;thought-crimes&quot;. Kamma (or &quot;intention&quot;), wether good or bad, is only made by individuals, not groups. So in Buddhism, you can&#39;t throw a big lasso around a certain demographic of people - say, all having the same skin color - and proclaim they are all evil. There are instead certain _individuals_ who are bad, who just so happen to have a certain skin color in common. And other-skin-colored individuals might be similarly bad people (having observed their morality), thereby not swerving from taking each of them all, as individuals.</p><p>When it comes to blameworthy speech or action, Buddhism only places blame on speech or action _when it is committed_. An _omission_ of action or speech is not deemed blameworthy. </p><p>Having said this, the &quot;heaviest&quot; Kamma is the thinking kind (in the sense of bringing the worst consequences); not the speaking or acting kinds of kamma. This is especially true of thinking-kamma, if it is the hateful or vengeful kind (should our minds become &quot;stuck&quot; in that kind of mode).</p><p>PS: I think modern Psychology would add to this and point out that newborn babies absolutely need love, affection, and care, in order to &quot;attune&quot; them (as in, raise them properly), so I would say that&#39;s a special case of &quot;compelled&quot; speech or action being immoral to withhold, by the parents.</p><p><a href=\"https://c.im/tags/psychology\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>psychology</span></a></p>", "contentMap": { "en": "<p>In <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Buddhism\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Buddhism</span></a>, there are thankfully no &quot;thought-crimes&quot;. Kamma (or &quot;intention&quot;), wether good or bad, is only made by individuals, not groups. So in Buddhism, you can&#39;t throw a big lasso around a certain demographic of people - say, all having the same skin color - and proclaim they are all evil. There are instead certain _individuals_ who are bad, who just so happen to have a certain skin color in common. And other-skin-colored individuals might be similarly bad people (having observed their morality), thereby not swerving from taking each of them all, as individuals.</p><p>When it comes to blameworthy speech or action, Buddhism only places blame on speech or action _when it is committed_. An _omission_ of action or speech is not deemed blameworthy. </p><p>Having said this, the &quot;heaviest&quot; Kamma is the thinking kind (in the sense of bringing the worst consequences); not the speaking or acting kinds of kamma. This is especially true of thinking-kamma, if it is the hateful or vengeful kind (should our minds become &quot;stuck&quot; in that kind of mode).</p><p>PS: I think modern Psychology would add to this and point out that newborn babies absolutely need love, affection, and care, in order to &quot;attune&quot; them (as in, raise them properly), so I would say that&#39;s a special case of &quot;compelled&quot; speech or action being immoral to withhold, by the parents.</p><p><a href=\"https://c.im/tags/psychology\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>psychology</span></a></p>" }, "updated": "2024-08-18T07:55:45Z", "attachment": [], "tag": [ { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://c.im/tags/buddhism", "name": "#buddhism" }, { "type": "Hashtag", "href": "https://c.im/tags/psychology", "name": "#psychology" } ], "replies": { "id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112981809088195371/replies", "type": "Collection", "first": { "type": "CollectionPage", "next": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112981809088195371/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true", "partOf": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112981809088195371/replies", "items": [] } }, "likes": { "id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112981809088195371/likes", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 1 }, "shares": { "id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112981809088195371/shares", "type": "Collection", "totalItems": 1 } }