A small tool to view real-world ActivityPub objects as JSON! Enter a URL
or username from Mastodon or a similar service below, and we'll send a
request with
the right
Accept
header
to the server to view the underlying object.
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"ostatus": "http://ostatus.org#",
"atomUri": "ostatus:atomUri",
"inReplyToAtomUri": "ostatus:inReplyToAtomUri",
"conversation": "ostatus:conversation",
"sensitive": "as:sensitive",
"toot": "http://joinmastodon.org/ns#",
"votersCount": "toot:votersCount",
"blurhash": "toot:blurhash",
"focalPoint": {
"@container": "@list",
"@id": "toot:focalPoint"
},
"Hashtag": "as:Hashtag"
}
],
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/collections/featured",
"type": "OrderedCollection",
"totalItems": 4,
"orderedItems": [
{
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114425572261688019",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2025-04-30T06:47:50Z",
"url": "https://c.im/@sbb/114425572261688019",
"attributedTo": "https://c.im/users/sbb",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://c.im/users/sbb/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114425572261688019",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:c.im,2025-04-30:objectId=278585238:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>I've been doing a lot of thinking around the nature of trust. I received the highly beneficial advice to think over who the most trustworthy people actually are, in my life. A diagram that looks like a bullseye was drawn, and I was invited to fill in actual names of people I know - where do they belong within the rings of the bullseye? The people in the middle are the most trustworthy, and the outermost rings are where the least trustworthy names go.</p><p>It was difficult to decide who's name belonged in which ring of the bullseye. So I assigned numbers to the rings of the bullseye. 1 was in the middle, 9 was right outside the bullseye. I then made a list of all the people I knew. I assigned them all numbers, then thought over the numbers, occasionally changing a number a little more or less.</p><p>When I was finished, I described the meaning of all the numbers, 1 through 9. This labeling made the most sense to me, to give more meaning to these numbers. Here they are:</p><p>1. Deep trust. Someone who totally accepts you as you are.</p><p>2. Someone who wouldn't betray you, has affinity with you, but you can't say they totally accept you as you are. They'd like to see you change.</p><p>3. A friend with a solid character, but affinity? Maybe.</p><p>4. A "fair-weather friend".</p><p>5. Any random stranger on the street. No positive or negative to speak of; still undefined and mysterious. No basis of judgement yet.</p><p>6. Negativity starts here, but it's very subtle and insidious; well hidden. Psychological predation and deception begins here. Plays mind games. Wants to come out looking better than you. Is certainly a "frenemy" or perhaps even worse, wants to turn you into a "flying monkey". A 6 has the mind of a perfect salesman or ambassador. Uses a lot of paltering; deceptive framing of everything. Plays on emotions a lot, seldom facts, unless they fit a narrative.</p><p>7. Corrupt. Has a mind of a racketeer.</p><p>8. Sketchy. Criminality begins here.</p><p>9. Predator. DANGEROUS</p><p><a href=\"https://c.im/tags/friendship\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>friendship</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/psychology\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>psychology</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/spirituality\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>spirituality</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/trust\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>trust</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/SelfCare\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>SelfCare</span></a></p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>I've been doing a lot of thinking around the nature of trust. I received the highly beneficial advice to think over who the most trustworthy people actually are, in my life. A diagram that looks like a bullseye was drawn, and I was invited to fill in actual names of people I know - where do they belong within the rings of the bullseye? The people in the middle are the most trustworthy, and the outermost rings are where the least trustworthy names go.</p><p>It was difficult to decide who's name belonged in which ring of the bullseye. So I assigned numbers to the rings of the bullseye. 1 was in the middle, 9 was right outside the bullseye. I then made a list of all the people I knew. I assigned them all numbers, then thought over the numbers, occasionally changing a number a little more or less.</p><p>When I was finished, I described the meaning of all the numbers, 1 through 9. This labeling made the most sense to me, to give more meaning to these numbers. Here they are:</p><p>1. Deep trust. Someone who totally accepts you as you are.</p><p>2. Someone who wouldn't betray you, has affinity with you, but you can't say they totally accept you as you are. They'd like to see you change.</p><p>3. A friend with a solid character, but affinity? Maybe.</p><p>4. A "fair-weather friend".</p><p>5. Any random stranger on the street. No positive or negative to speak of; still undefined and mysterious. No basis of judgement yet.</p><p>6. Negativity starts here, but it's very subtle and insidious; well hidden. Psychological predation and deception begins here. Plays mind games. Wants to come out looking better than you. Is certainly a "frenemy" or perhaps even worse, wants to turn you into a "flying monkey". A 6 has the mind of a perfect salesman or ambassador. Uses a lot of paltering; deceptive framing of everything. Plays on emotions a lot, seldom facts, unless they fit a narrative.</p><p>7. Corrupt. Has a mind of a racketeer.</p><p>8. Sketchy. Criminality begins here.</p><p>9. Predator. DANGEROUS</p><p><a href=\"https://c.im/tags/friendship\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>friendship</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/psychology\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>psychology</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/spirituality\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>spirituality</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/trust\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>trust</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/SelfCare\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>SelfCare</span></a></p>"
},
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"url": "https://s3.c.im/media_attachments/files/114/425/556/782/161/000/original/f1f12b167858fdac.jpeg",
"name": "A hand-drawn diagram: A \"bullseye\" (a circle) with 7 concentric rings. It's labelled 1 though 9, with 1 in the center of the bullseye, and 9 is right outside the bullseye.",
"blurhash": "UcM@iw-;-;xu?bxtWBRj~qoeM{j[WBRja#WB",
"focalPoint": [
0.29,
-0.45
],
"width": 741,
"height": 823
}
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/friendship",
"name": "#friendship"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/psychology",
"name": "#psychology"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/spirituality",
"name": "#spirituality"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/trust",
"name": "#trust"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/selfcare",
"name": "#selfcare"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114425572261688019/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114425572261688019/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114425572261688019/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114425572261688019/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114425572261688019/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
},
{
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114112799787739000",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2025-03-06T01:05:41Z",
"url": "https://c.im/@sbb/114112799787739000",
"attributedTo": "https://c.im/users/sbb",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://c.im/users/sbb/followers",
"https://fosstodon.org/users/vjprema"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114112799787739000",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:fosstodon.org,2025-03-05:objectId=294779819:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://fosstodon.org/@vjprema\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>vjprema</span></a></span> Bhante Sujato's translations, as well as 20% of the Wisdom Publications Bhikkhu Bodhi translations (arguably even better) of the Early Buddhist texts are free to read at:<br /><a href=\"https://suttacentral.net\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">suttacentral.net</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a><br />I also did a 37-minute video presentation several years ago about the Early Buddhist Texts, explaining more context around about what you see in the chart below:<br /><a href=\"https://bhikkhu.ca/suttas/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">bhikkhu.ca/suttas/</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a><br />(I apologize for the hissy audio in that older video - I'll do it over if I get enough requests)<br /><a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Buddhism\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Buddhism</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Buddha\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Buddha</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Theravada\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Theravada</span></a></p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://fosstodon.org/@vjprema\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>vjprema</span></a></span> Bhante Sujato's translations, as well as 20% of the Wisdom Publications Bhikkhu Bodhi translations (arguably even better) of the Early Buddhist texts are free to read at:<br /><a href=\"https://suttacentral.net\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">suttacentral.net</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a><br />I also did a 37-minute video presentation several years ago about the Early Buddhist Texts, explaining more context around about what you see in the chart below:<br /><a href=\"https://bhikkhu.ca/suttas/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://</span><span class=\"\">bhikkhu.ca/suttas/</span><span class=\"invisible\"></span></a><br />(I apologize for the hissy audio in that older video - I'll do it over if I get enough requests)<br /><a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Buddhism\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Buddhism</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Buddha\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Buddha</span></a> <a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Theravada\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Theravada</span></a></p>"
},
"attachment": [
{
"type": "Document",
"mediaType": "image/png",
"url": "https://s3.c.im/media_attachments/files/114/112/768/615/533/047/original/a7db59e85500404b.png",
"name": null,
"blurhash": "UGODwY0NoeRO=:S~f6ni_4=|WBR*%jXToLsl",
"width": 1287,
"height": 723
}
],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://fosstodon.org/users/vjprema",
"name": "@vjprema@fosstodon.org"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/buddhism",
"name": "#buddhism"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/buddha",
"name": "#buddha"
},
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/Theravada",
"name": "#Theravada"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114112799787739000/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114112799787739000/replies?min_id=114113309994147343&page=true",
"partOf": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114112799787739000/replies",
"items": [
"https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114113309994147343"
]
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114112799787739000/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 4
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/114112799787739000/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
}
},
{
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/113060685551744917",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2024-09-01T05:39:12Z",
"url": "https://c.im/@sbb/113060685551744917",
"attributedTo": "https://c.im/users/sbb",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://c.im/users/sbb/followers"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/113060685551744917",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:c.im,2024-09-01:objectId=202864335:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p>I went from just _passably_ enjoying Mastodon, to actually feeling it was worthwhile to participate in Mastodon, when I made a careful distinction in who I decided to mute:</p><p>I didn't get hung up on judging the _causes_ that people spoke on behalf of, in favor for or against. I looked at _how_ they said it. It was all in the _how_.</p><p>As soon as they said anything in a nasty tone, just like a Narcissist or Machiavellian would be expected to, and I detected what I _believed_ to be "gaslighting" (exaggerating, which undermines people's sense of self esteem or self-worth) and agenda-loaded snarkiness, that earned an instant Mute, or a Block in more extreme cases.</p><p>It was all in the *how*, for *how people said things*, not so much the *what*, of *what they actually said*.</p><p>This tuning into people's tone _first and foremost_, and mercilessly "tit-for-tatting" them in this way, drastically cleaned up the quality of my timelines. It was a tuning in to my own emotional affect from the posts; listening to that as a good measurement for what I was willing to accept, and thereby invited hearing more of.</p><p><a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Mastodon\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Mastodon</span></a></p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p>I went from just _passably_ enjoying Mastodon, to actually feeling it was worthwhile to participate in Mastodon, when I made a careful distinction in who I decided to mute:</p><p>I didn't get hung up on judging the _causes_ that people spoke on behalf of, in favor for or against. I looked at _how_ they said it. It was all in the _how_.</p><p>As soon as they said anything in a nasty tone, just like a Narcissist or Machiavellian would be expected to, and I detected what I _believed_ to be "gaslighting" (exaggerating, which undermines people's sense of self esteem or self-worth) and agenda-loaded snarkiness, that earned an instant Mute, or a Block in more extreme cases.</p><p>It was all in the *how*, for *how people said things*, not so much the *what*, of *what they actually said*.</p><p>This tuning into people's tone _first and foremost_, and mercilessly "tit-for-tatting" them in this way, drastically cleaned up the quality of my timelines. It was a tuning in to my own emotional affect from the posts; listening to that as a good measurement for what I was willing to accept, and thereby invited hearing more of.</p><p><a href=\"https://c.im/tags/Mastodon\" class=\"mention hashtag\" rel=\"tag\">#<span>Mastodon</span></a></p>"
},
"updated": "2024-09-01T09:49:54Z",
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Hashtag",
"href": "https://c.im/tags/mastodon",
"name": "#mastodon"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/113060685551744917/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/113060685551744917/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/113060685551744917/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/113060685551744917/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 5
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/113060685551744917/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 1
}
},
{
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112889108136402079",
"type": "Note",
"summary": null,
"inReplyTo": null,
"published": "2024-08-01T22:24:48Z",
"url": "https://c.im/@sbb/112889108136402079",
"attributedTo": "https://c.im/users/sbb",
"to": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
],
"cc": [
"https://c.im/users/sbb/followers",
"https://infosec.exchange/users/jerry"
],
"sensitive": false,
"atomUri": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112889108136402079",
"inReplyToAtomUri": null,
"conversation": "tag:infosec.exchange,2024-08-01:objectId=181127870:objectType=Conversation",
"content": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/@jerry\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>jerry</span></a></span> for most of human history, *humans have been very tribal*. It's only in the last 300ish years that "Age of Enlightenment" values have boldly endeavored to transcend the sometimes-ugly dynamics of tribalism - an "us vs. them", "ingroup-outgroup" mentality. Vast swathes of humanity still haven't signed up for these Age of Enlightenment values (or fail to understand and appreciate them), and aren't going to "subscribe" to them any time soon:</p><p>"The Enlightenment: Crash Course European History #18"<br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnoFj2cMRLY\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">youtube.com/watch?v=NnoFj2cMRL</span><span class=\"invisible\">Y</span></a><br />...has nice summarizations of characteristically Western values, BTW.</p><p>The wide-open internet - where anyone can much more easily say anything to anyone *as though tribalism could no longer possibly exist* - is a big, messy social experiment that has no guarantee of succeeding.</p><p>My prediction is that the internet will gradually unfortunately need to become a much more "tribal" place - with many closed societies with "bouncer"-like watch-persons (and other protective mechanisms) needed. This closing off into tribes - raising the medieval drawbridges, as it were - will be necessary to model (and thereby mirror) the psychological milieu which the internet is moreso _actually characterized by_.</p><p>The wide-open public forum areas of the internet are a big "tragedy of the commons" - which apparently will not be able to hold its ground to tribalism - and will, alas, probably lose the gains which were so hard-won by the pioneers of the Age of Enlightenment. Widespread default trust in the public sphere was needed for those values to do their magic, but alas, that trust is quickly eroding.</p>",
"contentMap": {
"en": "<p><span class=\"h-card\" translate=\"no\"><a href=\"https://infosec.exchange/@jerry\" class=\"u-url mention\">@<span>jerry</span></a></span> for most of human history, *humans have been very tribal*. It's only in the last 300ish years that "Age of Enlightenment" values have boldly endeavored to transcend the sometimes-ugly dynamics of tribalism - an "us vs. them", "ingroup-outgroup" mentality. Vast swathes of humanity still haven't signed up for these Age of Enlightenment values (or fail to understand and appreciate them), and aren't going to "subscribe" to them any time soon:</p><p>"The Enlightenment: Crash Course European History #18"<br /><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnoFj2cMRLY\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" translate=\"no\"><span class=\"invisible\">https://www.</span><span class=\"ellipsis\">youtube.com/watch?v=NnoFj2cMRL</span><span class=\"invisible\">Y</span></a><br />...has nice summarizations of characteristically Western values, BTW.</p><p>The wide-open internet - where anyone can much more easily say anything to anyone *as though tribalism could no longer possibly exist* - is a big, messy social experiment that has no guarantee of succeeding.</p><p>My prediction is that the internet will gradually unfortunately need to become a much more "tribal" place - with many closed societies with "bouncer"-like watch-persons (and other protective mechanisms) needed. This closing off into tribes - raising the medieval drawbridges, as it were - will be necessary to model (and thereby mirror) the psychological milieu which the internet is moreso _actually characterized by_.</p><p>The wide-open public forum areas of the internet are a big "tragedy of the commons" - which apparently will not be able to hold its ground to tribalism - and will, alas, probably lose the gains which were so hard-won by the pioneers of the Age of Enlightenment. Widespread default trust in the public sphere was needed for those values to do their magic, but alas, that trust is quickly eroding.</p>"
},
"updated": "2024-08-02T00:53:28Z",
"attachment": [],
"tag": [
{
"type": "Mention",
"href": "https://infosec.exchange/users/jerry",
"name": "@jerry@infosec.exchange"
}
],
"replies": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112889108136402079/replies",
"type": "Collection",
"first": {
"type": "CollectionPage",
"next": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112889108136402079/replies?only_other_accounts=true&page=true",
"partOf": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112889108136402079/replies",
"items": []
}
},
"likes": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112889108136402079/likes",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 2
},
"shares": {
"id": "https://c.im/users/sbb/statuses/112889108136402079/shares",
"type": "Collection",
"totalItems": 0
}
}
]
}